Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

SWAPNA SUKUMAR & ORS. versus STATE OF KERALA & ORS.

Decided
10 April 2015
Judges listed
F.M. IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, SHIVA KIRTI SINGH (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2015] 4 S.C.R. 341 · 2015 INSC 314

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

I.A. N0.6

p. 342, margin A

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant does not want to press this I.A. The I.A. is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.

p. 342, margin A

1

A. N0.7 I.A. No.7 is allowed in terms of prayer 'a'.

p. 342, margin B