Supreme Court of India

RELIANCE PETROCHEMICALS LTD. versus PROPRIETORS OF INDIAN EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS, BOMBAY PVT. LTD. & ORS.

Decided: 23 September 1988
Judges listed: SABYASACHI MUKHERJI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Disposed off

Citations

Official

[1988] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 212 · 1988 INSC 297

Also cited as

(1988) 4 SCC 592 (25 citing judgments)
AIR 1989 SC 190 (6 citing judgments)
MANU/SC/0412/1988 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 10 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

CELIR LLP versus MR. SUMATI PRASAD BAFNA & ORS. 13 December 2024 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 191
BALWANTBHAI SOMABHAI BHANDARI versus HIRALAL SOMABHAI CONTRACTOR (DECEASED) REP. BY LRS. & ORS. 6 September 2023 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 41
IN RE: PRASHANT BHUSHAN AND ANR. versus IN RE: 31 August 2020 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 59 and 1 other paragraph
CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, versus SUBHASH CHANDRA AGARWAL 13 November 2019 · bench of 5 judges · cites it at para 84
CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS versus TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND OTHERS 11 May 2016 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 71

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.