Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

KESHARBAI @ PUSHPABAI EKNATHRAO NALAWADE versus TARABAI PRABHAKARRAO NALAWADE & ORS.

Decided
4 April 2014
Judges listed
S.S. NIJJAR, A.K. SIKRI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Modified

Citations

Official
[2014] 3 S.C.R. 780 ยท 2014 INSC 957

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

1

On 27th March, 2014, we had directed to delete the following words in paragraph 22 of the Judgment delivered on 14th March, 2014 in Civil Appeal No.3867 of 2014 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.27916 of 2009]: "and set aside the findings recorded by the trial court on Issue No.Ill."

p. 780, margin F

2

However, inadvertently, the following line in the said A paragraph is deleted: "The judgment of the Trial Court is confirmed on Issue No. Ill also."

p. 781

3

Let the necessary amended be made and the amended paragraph 22 of the said judgment will read as follows: "22. In view of the aforesaid, we allow the appeal. The judgment of the Trial Court is confirmed on Issue No. Ill also. Consequently, the suit filed by the plaintiffs (respondents herein) C shall stand dismissed." R.P. Judgment modified.

p. 781