Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

U.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ALLAHABAD versus VINOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND ORS.

Decided
31 July 1995
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, K.S. PARIPOORNAN (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[1995] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 424 · 1995 INSC 431

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Leave granted.

p. 424, margin H

We have heard the counsel for the parties. The admitted facts as transpired from the record are that the Assistant Labour Commissioners are eligible to be promoted according to Rule 5 of the U.P. Labour Service Rules , 1991 to their quota of 50%. The balance 50% shall be filled in by direct recruitment. Twenty- three posts are available for promotion. The Selection Committee consisting of members of the Public Service Commission and the Departmental personnel considered the inter se claims from feeder posts on September 13, 1993 and forwarded to the Government the select list for approval subject to the result in W.P. No. 5744/86. One Mr. Awasthi who filed that writ petiton has since been retired as Dy Labour Officer pursuant to the direction issued by the Court, the claims of others for promotion require to be considered and finalised. We direct the Government to finalise the list as recommended by the Public Service Commission and then. make promotion to the substantive posts according to Rules of all the persons recommended by the Public Service Commission within the quota prescribed under the Rules. The appeal is disposed of. No costs. T.N.A. Appeal disposed of.

p. 425, margin A