Supreme Court of India

PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA versus CHAIRMAN, BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATNA AND ORS.

Decided: 6 August 2004
Judges listed: R.C. LAHOTI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Leave Granted & Dismissed

Citations

Official

[2004] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 372 · 2004 INSC 425

Also cited as

(2004) 6 SCC 714 (68 citing judgments)
AIR 2004 SC 4116 (18 citing judgments)
(2004) SCC(L&S) 883 (10 citing judgments)
AIR 2004 SCW 4541 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 8 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

DR. B R AMEDKAR UNIVERSITY, AGRA versus DEVARSH NATH GUPTA & ORS. 14 February 2023 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 12
DR. NTR UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES versus DR. YERRA TRINADH & OTHERS 4 November 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 5 and 1 other paragraph
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA THROUGH THE REGISTRAR GENERAL versus TIRTHA SARATHI MUKHERJEE & ORS. 6 February 2019 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 7 and 3 other paragraphs
TANIYA MALIK versus THE REGISTRAR GENERAL OF THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI 16 February 2018 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 15
THE SECRETARY, ALL INDIA PRE-MEDICAL/PREDENTAL EXAMINATION, C.B.S.E. & ORS. versus KHUSHBOO SHRIVASTAVA & ORS. 17 August 2011 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 5 and 1 other paragraph

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.