Supreme Court of India
NAWAL SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC. versus UNION OF INDIA ETC. ETC.
- Decided
- 25 July 1995
- Judges listed
- K. RAMASWAMY, K.S. PARIPOORNAN
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Citations
- Official
- [1995] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 307 · 1995 INSC 410
- Not shown
- 1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.
Cited by
We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.
Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.
The Court's text
Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.
CA. No. 2130 OF 1980.
p. 308, margin C
Notification under s.4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was published on November 13, 1959 acquiring 1876 Bighas 19 Biswas land situated in Jwalahari for planned development of Delhi. The Land Acquisition Collector classified the lands as A, B, C Blocks and awarded @ Rs. 1600, Rs. 1400 and Rs. 1000 per bigha respectively. On reference under s.18 of the Act, the Additional District Judge by his Award and Decree dated September 8, 1979 further enhanced the compensation to Rs. 4250, 3200 and 2150 per bigha respectively. The High Court, on appeal, further enhanced the compensation to Rs. 5250, 4000 and 3000 respectively. Not being satisfied with the enhanced compensation awarded by the High Court, the claimants have filed these appeals under s.54 of the Act claiming enhanced compensation @ Rs. 9,000 per bigha.
p. 308, margin C
The High Court found that there are no sale transactions in the village Jwalahari other than one sale transaction in village Madipur which is said to be adjacent to the village Jwalahari. That sale deed was dated April 20, 1959 just before the Notification. An extent of 1472.22 sq. yards was sold in Khasra No. 828 for a consideration of Rs. 7726 which worked out at Rs. 5250 per bigha. Based thereon, the High Court has enhanced the compensation. It is now a settled principle that the price of a small extent of land cannot form the sole basis for fixation of higher compensation when a large track of land is acquired. Since the State did not file any appeal, we need not go into the correctness of the finding recorded by the High Court. Suffice it to state that there is no other evidence on record for us to further enhance the compensation.
p. 308, margin E
It is next contended that the High Court having made a distinction between the owner and the mortgagee and enhanced 25% extra compensation to the owner, committed a grave error of law in not awarding the same to the appellants. We find no discernible principl.e made by the High Court to further enhance 25% more to the owner while awarding the .market value to the mortgagee. Under these circumstances, we do not find any legal principle warranting further enhancement of 25% extra compen- . sation. The appeals are accordingly dismissed but, in the circumstances, without costs.
pp. 308–309, margin H
All applications for substitutions & consolidation and reduction of security are allowed.
p. 309, margin B
CA. Nos. 2525, 2524, 2970, 2823, 1895180, 1577, 3112, 1376181, 3151/80, 3758/82, 1784/81, 1375/81 and CA. No. 7048 of 1995 (arising out of SLP (C) No. 2161/81).
p. 309, margin C
Leave granted in S.L.P. No. 2161 of 1981.
p. 309, margin C
Following the order made just now in C.A. 2130/80, these appeals shall stand dismissed. No costs. G.N. Appeal dismissed.
p. 309, margin D