Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

M/S. JERMYN CAPITAL LLC DUBAI versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.

Decided
17 May 2023
Judges listed
KRISHNA MURARI, SANJAY KUMAR (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2023] 6 S.C.R. 570 · 2023 INSC 547

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

IA No. 100413/2023 in M.A. No. 1278/2023

p. 571, margin A

By way of this application, the appellant seeks modification of the order dated 09.05.2023 passed by this Court allowing the appeal. Thereby, the condition imposed upon the appellant by the Courts below to furnish a bank guarantee for release of the sum of 38.52 crore was set aside and the appellant was permitted to withdraw the said amount along with 4 percent simple interest payable from 08.05.2006 till the date of actual payment.

p. 571, margin A

2

While so, the appellant produced copies of various orders passed earlier, be it by the Securities Appellate Tribunal or by this Court, directing the sale proceeds, which ultimately aggregated to 38.52 crore, to be placed in bank fixed deposits so as to garner a higher rate of interest. Reference in this regard may be made to the order dated 08.05.2006 of the Securities Appellate Tribunal and the orders dated 05.12.2008, 14.05.2009 & 16.11.2009 passed by this Court.

p. 571, margin C

3

In that view of the matter, the final order dated 09.05.2023 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 1434 of 2023 shall stand modified by substituting para 21 therein as under: “21. As a consequence, the appellant shall be permitted to unconditionally withdraw the aforesaid amount along with the fixed deposit interest amount that has accrued thereon.”

p. 571, margin D

4

IA No. 100413/2023 is allowed and, in consequence, M.A. No. 1278/2023 stands disposed of.

p. 571, margin F