Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

AJAYINDER SANGWAN AND ORS. versus K. K. MOHAN

Decided
5 February 2018
Judges listed
R.K. AGRAWAL (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[2018] 1 S.C.R. 600 · 2018 INSC 98

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

1

This petition has been filed by the present applicants seeking initiation of proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, for alleged willful disobedience of this Court’s order dated 14.12.2017 along with orders dated 23.08.2017 and 24.11.2017 passed in Transferred Case (C) No. 126 of 2015.

p. 601, margin G

2

In the application for directions filed on behalf of the Bar Council of India (BCI) on 23.01.2018, we find that the BCI has finalized the schedule for election in respective State Bar Councils. Further, we are of the opinion that the election schedule as finalized by the BCI is just and proper.

p. 602, margin A

3

In view of the above, we are of the considered opinion that no case has been made out to initiate contempt proceeding against the BCI. The contempt petition is hereby dismissed.

p. 602, margin B