Supreme Court of India
DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION versus T. LEKSHMAIAH AND ORS.
- Decided
- 2 April 1997
- Judges listed
- K. RAMASWAMY, D.P. WADHWA
- Disposal
- Appeal(s) allowed
Citations
- Official
- [1997] 3 S.C.R. 526 · 1997 INSC 354
Cited by
We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.
Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.
The Court's text
Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.
This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in R.P. No. 767/81, made on June 26, 1985. Tribunal has allowed the representation petition, solely on the ground of default on the part of the appellant to file the counter-affidavit. Therein they had claimed the benefit of graded increments depending upon the length of service in terms of G.O.Ms. No. 41, Finance and planning (in Wing. PRC-I) dated 4.2.1980.
p. 526, margin E
The admitted position is that the respondents were working in the post of Senior Assistant Grade-II in the pay scale of Rs. 200-240/-. They were promoted to Grade-I in the scale of Rs.430-800/-. The Government passed an order in G.O.Ms. No.235, dated September 7, 1979, effective from April 1, 1978, granting the revised pay scales. As stated earlier, G.O. Ms. No. 41, Fin., dated 4.2.1980 gives the benefit as under :
p. 526, margin G
"Weightage for service in the existing post or category shall be as follows in the revised scale of pay, 1978. (i) All employees in Gr.I to XVII shall be allowed one increment for service of three years and above upto five years two increments for service of five years and above upto seven years, three incre-
p. 527, margin A
ments for service of service seven years and above."
p. 527, margin B
The question, therefore, is: whether the respondents are entitled to have their entire previous service as Trade-II teachers a tagged to count the advance increments in terms of G.O.Ms. No.41, referred to earlier. It specifically envisages "weightage for service in the existing post or category". It would indicate that the weightage for the service rendered in the existing post or category in which they are working shall be taken into account in terms of G.O.Ms.No.41, In other words, if Grade-I teacher remains in Grade-I service even after putting in five years' service, he is entitled to one increment,' after five to seven years; service, he is entitled to two increments, and for service of seven years and above, he is entitled to three increments as outer limit. on his promotion to Grade II from Grade-I in scale of Rs.430-800/-, necessarily on his rendering service in that post or category, namely, Grade-I, on his putting in service of three years to five years 'service, he is entitled to one increment, for five to seven years' service, he is entitled to two increments, and for service of seven years and above, he is entitled to three increments. He cannot tag on the previous service in Grade-II for the purpose of claiming the advance increments in terms of G.O.Ms, No.41, dated February 4, 1980.
p. 527, margin B
The appeal, therefore, is allowed, The order of the Tribunal stands set aside. No costs. T.N.A. Appeal allowed.
p. 527, margin E