Supreme Court of India

T.R. KOTHANDARAMAN ETC. ETC. versus TAMIL NADU WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE BD. AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

Decided: 13 September 1994
Judges listed: KULDIP SINGH (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Dismissed

Citations

Official

[1994] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 513 · 1994 INSC 386

Also cited as

(1994) 6 SCC 282 (22 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 6 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK BY CHAIRMAN & ANR. versus ASTAMIJA DASH 30 April 2008 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 40
MOHD. RIAZUL USMAN GANI AND ORS. versus DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, NAGPUR AND ORS. 11 February 2000 · bench of 2 judges and 1 other paragraph
STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR versus SHIV RAM SHARMA AND OTHERS 30 March 1999 · bench of 2 judges
FOOD CORPORATLON OF INDIA versus OM PRAKASH SHARMA AND ORS. 14 August 1998 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 27
RAJASTHAN STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD ACCOUNTANTS ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR versus RAJASTHAN STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR. 4 February 1997 · bench of 2 judges and 3 other paragraphs

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.