Supreme Court of India

TEJ KAUR AND ANR. versus KIRPAL SINGH AND ANR.

Decided: 10 May 1995
Judges listed: K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Dismissed

Citations

Official

[1995] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 383 · 1995 INSC 368

Also cited as

(1995) 5 SCC 119 (4 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 4 other Supreme Court judgments we hold.

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS versus PRATAP KARAN AND OTHERS 9 October 2015 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 14 and 1 other paragraph
PANKAJAKSHI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. versus CHANDRIKA AND ORS. 8 November 2010 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 5
P.V. HEMALATHA versus KATTAMKANDI PUTHIYA MALIACKAL SAHEEDA AND ANR. 20 May 2002 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 16 and 1 other paragraph
M/S SIKKIM SUBBA ASSOCIATES versus STATE OF SIKKIM 1 May 2001 · bench of 3 judges and 1 other paragraph

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.