Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

BAGIRATH SINGH AND ANR. versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

Decided
6 September 2005
Judges listed
B.P. SINGH (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[2005] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 1179 · 2005 INSC 402

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

B.P. SINGH, J. : This Civil Appeal has been preferred by the appellants against the order of the High Court dismissing the review petition filed by them for review of the judgment and order of the High Court in Civil Writ Petition No. 18310 of 1998.

p. 1179, margin E

We have today dismissed Civil Appeal No. 646 of 2000 arising out of CWP No. 18310 of 1998. We, therefore, find no merit in this appeal and the same is accordingly dismissed. R.P. Appeal dismissed.

p. 1179, margin F