Supreme Court of India
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, JABALPUR versus S. S. SHUKLA ETC. ETC.
- Decided
- 28 April 1976
- Judges listed
- A.N. RAY
- Disposal
- Appeal(s) allowed
Citations
- Official
- [1976] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 172 · 1976 INSC 129
- Also cited as
- AIR 1976 SC 1207
- (1976) 2 SCC 521
Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.
Cited by
Cited in 25 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:
- THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. versus SHARWAN KUMAR KUMAWAT ETC. ETC
- KAUSHAL KISHOR versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
- MS. X versus REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
- SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION POWER COMPANY LIMITED OF ANDHRA PRADESH (APSPDCL) & ANR. versus M/S HINDUJA NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR
- S. KASI versus STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SAMAYNALLUR POLICE STATION MADURAI DISTRICT
Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.
The Court's text
Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.
By majority-
p. 477, margin D
In view of the Presidential Order dated 27 June 1975 no person has any locus standi to move any writ petition under Article 226 before a High Court for habeas corpus or any other writ or order or direction to challenge the legality of an order of detention on the ground that the order is not under or in compliance with the Act or is illegal or is vitiated by malafides factual or legal or is based on extraneous considerations;
p. 477, margin E
Section 16A(9) of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act is constitutionally valid;
p. 477, margin F
The appeals are accepted. The judgments are set aside;
p. 477, margin F
The petitions before the High Courts are now to be disposed of in accordance with the law laid down in these appeals. S.R .
p. 477, margin F