Supreme Court of India

B. BANERJEE versus ANITA PAN

Decided: 20 November 1974
Judges listed: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)

Citations

Official

[1975] 2 S.C.R. 774 · 1974 INSC 246

Also cited as

(1975) 1 SCC 166 (10 citing judgments)
AIR 1975 SC 1146 (6 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 4 other Supreme Court judgments we hold.

A. MANJULA BHASHINI & OTHERS versus THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, AP. WOMENS COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION LTD. AND ANOTHER, 6 July 2009 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 17
FERRO ALLOYS CORPN. LTD. AND ORS. versus A.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS 15 April 1993 · bench of 2 judges
T. VELAYUDHAN ACHARI AND ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 5 February 1993 · bench of 3 judges
BACHAN SINGH ETC. ETC. versus STATE OF PUNJAB ETC. ETC. 9 May 1980 · bench of 5 judges and 1 other paragraph

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Unnumbered paragraph¶

In accordance with the majoritv judgment, ·the appeals are allowed with costs; the cases are remanded to the High Court, and the High Court is directed to dispose of the: case in the light of the direc:tions and obs(:rvations made in the maj'lritv judgment. It will be open to the Court seised of the matter to direct, in its discretion, amount of costs to be incurred hereafter. P.B.R. (l) [1963] Supp, I S.C.R. 282.

p. 800, margin E