Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

PREETI SINGH versus SANDEEP SINGH AND ORS.

Decided
25 April 1995
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)

Citations

Official
[1995] 3 S.C.R. 743 · 1995 INSC 295

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Petition under Section 13(B)(l) & (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 for a decree of divorce by mutual consent duly signed by both the parties is taken on record.

p. 744, margin A

As per the directions of this Court by order dated October 21, 1994, the parties have filed the petition for mutual divorce. In terms of the order, the marriage of the petitioner and the respondent stands dissolved and the divorce takes effect from today. In terms of the compromise all the proceedings instituted by either party in any Court or before any authority stand withdrawn and dismissed.

p. 744, margin B

In terms of the order passed by this Court earlier, amount of Rs. 1.25 lakhs in addition to Rs. 30,000 were deposited by the respondent in the name of daughter Approva. The said amount shall remain in the name of minor till she attains majority. The respondent has also paid Rs. 1.5 lakhs to the petitioner.

p. 744, margin C

It is brought to our notice that the respondent had not given to the petitioner 2000 Units of Seven Years Monthly Income Unit with Bonus and Growth, 1990(II) (Cumulative Growth) valued at Rs. 20,000 deposited on December 31, 1990 which would mature on December 16, 1997. While the respondent has handed over a 'Term Deposit Receipt No. 555924' dated 17.11.1994 for a sum of Rs. 32,000 deposited in the name of his minor daughter, which would represent the fixed deposit kept in the name of the minor in F.D.R. No. 555924, the interest accrued thereon was not added to the amount of Rs. 32,000 deposited by the respondent. Learned counsel for the respondent fairly agreed across the Bar that his client would give the aforesaid units and deposit the amount of interest of the fixed deposit in the name of the minor and would hand over the fixed deposit receipt thereof to the counsel for the petitioner. Counsel for the respondent has undertaken to handover the same to the counsel for the petitioner and obtain the receipt of handing over within six months from today.

p. 744, margin D

The petition is accordingly disposed of. The disputes now totally stand concluded between the parties. T.N.A. Petition disposed of.

p. 744, margin G