Supreme Court of India

MALKHAN SINGH AND ORS. versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Decided: 8 July 2003
Judges listed: N. SANTOSH HEGDE (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Dismissed

Citations

Official

[2003] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 443 · 2003 INSC 308

Also cited as

(2003) SCC(CRI) 1247 (12 citing judgments)
(2003) 5 SCC 746 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

3 other citation strings that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 20 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

VISHWANATHA versus THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT 8 July 2024 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 15
P. SASIKUMAR versus THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE 8 July 2024 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 14
MUKESH SINGH versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) 24 August 2023 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 47
AMRIK SINGH versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB 11 July 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 4 and 1 other paragraph
RAJESH @ SARKARI & ANR versus STATE OF HARYANA 3 November 2020 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 37

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.