Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

VARAD BALWANT VASANT & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Decided
29 April 2024
Judges listed
D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[2024] 5 S.C.R. 533 · 2024 INSC 459

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Paragraph 1

The Chartered Accountant Examination for the Intermediate and final course is due to commence on 2 May 2024 and end on 17 May 2024.

p. 534

Paragraph 2

The bone of contention in these proceedings under Article 32 of the Constitution pertains to two examinations which are scheduled to be held on 8 May 2024 and 14 May 2024. The grievance is that phase-wise polling during the General Elections is scheduled to take place on 7 May and 13 May 2024 and hence, the convening of the examination on the above two days (one day after the phase-wise polling) will cause severe hardship to candidates.

p. 534

Paragraph 3

Ms Madhavi Divan, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that though there are 816 districts, there are only 290 centres where the examination is being held, as a consequence of which serious hardship may be caused to students coming from remote areas.

p. 534

Paragraph 4

A petition which was instituted before the High Court of Delhi was dismissed on 8 April 2024. However, independent of that, we have considered the grievance to assess whether a cause of action warranting the grant of relief has been established.

p. 534

Paragraph 5

On behalf of the Institute of Chartered Accounts, it has been submitted by Mr Ramji Srinivasan, senior counsel that : (i) As many as 4,36,246 candidates have been enrolled for the ensuing examination; (ii) Though 291 cities have examination centres, there are 591 centres across India to facilitate the convenience of students; and (iii) The Institute of Chartered Accountants has not scheduled the examination either on the day of polling or a day prior to polling days.

pp. 534–535

Paragraph 6

The scheduling of examinations essentially pertains to the policy domain. At the same time, bearing in mind the importance of the obligation which is cast upon every citizen to exercise their franchise, we have independently assessed whether the examination schedule will cause a dislocation for students who would are eligible to exercise their franchise and are enrolled for the examination. The number of centres is 591, spread across not only cities but other parts of the country as well. No examination has been scheduled on polling days or on a day prior. Over 4,36,000 candidates have enrolled for the examination. The grant of any relief at this stage would cause substantial prejudice.

p. 535

Paragraph 7

Ms Madhavi Divan, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted in the alternative that an option may be given to students who are unable to appear for the examinations which are scheduled on 8 and 14 May 2024 to take the examinations in a subsequent batch.

p. 535

Paragraph 8

We find considerable force in the submission which has been urged on behalf of Institute of Chartered Accountants that such a course of action would not be fair because it will allow some students to opt out of certain papers and take them in the ensuing examination. This will cause prejudice to those students who have to be assessed on the basis that they have taken all the papers at one and the same time. The arrangements that were made during the course of the COVID 19 pandemic stand on a completely different footing since the country was then faced with a public health crisis of unprecedented proportion. The relief as sought is contrary to the regulations and cannot be granted.

p. 535

Paragraph 9

Bearing in mind all the above circumstances, we are not in a position to accede to the request of the petitioners for the grant of relief.

p. 536

Paragraph 10

The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed.

p. 536

Paragraph 11

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey Result of the case: Writ Petition dismissed.

p. 536