Supreme Court of India

A.R. ANTULAY versus R.S. NAYAK & ANR.

Decided: 29 April 1988
Judges listed: SABYASACHI MUKHERJI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official

[1988] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 1 · 1988 INSC 123

Also cited as

(1988) 2 SCC 602 (50 citing judgments)
(1988) SCC(CRI) 372 (34 citing judgments)
AIR 1988 SC 1531 (15 citing judgments)
MANU/SC/0002/1988 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 94 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

CHANDRIKABEN KISHOR DAFDA versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. 1 July 2026 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 13
VASANTA SAMPAT DUPARE versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 25 August 2025 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 15 and 1 other paragraph
TORRENT POWER LIMITED versus U.P. ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS 14 July 2025 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 45
NATIONAL SPOT EXCHANGE LIMITED versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 14 May 2025 · cites it at para 11 and 1 other paragraph
SACHIN versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA 21 April 2025 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 25

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.