Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

STATE OF RAJASTHAN versus SEVA RAM AND ORS.

Decided
2 February 1996
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[1996] 2 S.C.R. 81 · 1996 INSC 173

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Mr. Medh, Advocate appears for respondent No. 1. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, though served, are not appearing either in person or through counsel.

p. 81, margin F

Leave granted.

p. 81, margin F

The controversy raised is covered by the order of this Court in C.A. 3204/95 and batch dated 28.2.1995 wherein delay was condoned and matters were remitted to the High Court for disposal along with the pending appeals for decision on merits. Accordingly, we set aside the order of the High Court and remit this matter to the High Court for disposal along with the pending appeals, if not already disposed of.

p. 81, margin G

If they are disposed of, the ratio therein may gover~ in thi• appeal .

p. 82

. Appeal i• di•posed of in above terms. No costs.

p. 82

Appeal disposed of. ·.

p. 82