Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

M/S MAGADH SUGAR & ENERGY LTD. versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

Decided
20 October 2021
Judges listed
D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, B.V. NAGARATHNA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2021] 6 S.C.R. 1094 · 2021 INSC 648

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

1

The Miscellaneous Application has been filed for correction of a typographical error in the judgment dated 24 September 2021.

p. 1094, margin G

2

The amount of Rs 56 crores and Rs 67 crores mentioned in paragraph 8 of the judgment shall be corrected to read as Rs 5.6 crores and Rs 67 lakhs respectively and the amount of Rs 67 crores in paragraph 10 of the judgment shall be corrected to read as Rs 67 lakhs.

pp. 1094–1095, margin G

3

In paragraph 15 of the judgment, the appearances of Mr S K Bagaria and Mr Saket Singh shall be corrected to read as Mr S K Bagaria, learned Senior Counsel and Mr Saket Singh, learned Counsel, respectively.

p. 1095, margin A

4

The Miscellaneous Application is accordingly disposed of.

p. 1095, margin B