Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

SANKALP CHARITABLE TRUST AND ANR. versus UNION OF INDJA AND ORS.

Decided
28 April 2016
Judges listed
ANIL R. DAVE, SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)

Citations

Official
[2016] 3 S.C.R. 547 · 2016 INSC 350
Also cited as
  • (2016) 7 SCC 487 (9 citing judgments)
  • AIR 2016 SC 2159 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 3 other Supreme Court judgments we hold.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

1

The following prayer has been made in this petition: "a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direciton in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to conduct the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) for admission to MBBS Course throughout the country for academic session 2016-17; (b) Jssue or pass any writ, direction or order, which this Hon 'hie Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case."

p. 548, margin A

2

When the matter was heard on 27th April, 2016, the following order was passed by this Court : "Taken on board. The learned counsel for the petitioner has assured this Court that he will remove the office objections by tomorrow. At his request, Respondent No.4 is deleted from · the array of parties. All the three respondents are represented by their respective counsel and they have assured this Court that they are ready and willing to hold NEET examination for 3 admission to MBBS and BOS courses for the academic year 2016-17. As the counsel representing CBSE would like to take necessary instructions, hearing is adjourned for tomorrow. Proposed schedule of the examination to be held, shall be submitted in the Court tomorrow. The learned counsel shall also see that a responsible officer of the CBSE, who can take on the spot decision, remains present in the Court. Listthe matter tomorrow, i.e., 28th April, 2016 at 12.00 p.m."

p. 548, margin C

3

The matter has been thereafter heard today. It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing for all the respondents that it is proposed to hold the examination in pursuance ofNotifications dated 21st December, 2010 issued by the Medical Council of India and the Dental Council oflndia ('DC!' for short).

p. 548, margin G

4

As per the said Notifications, a common entrance test, i.e., National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) shall be held.

p. 549, margin A

5

It was further submitted, interalia, as follows: "I. AIPMT 2016 to be held on I st May, 2016 shall be phase l of NEET. 2. Phase II ofNEET for the left out candidates shall be held on 24th July, 2016 by inviting applications with fee. 3: Combined result of both the Tests shall be declared on 17th August, 2016. 4. CBSE will provide All India Rank. Admitting Authorities will invite applications for Counselling and merit list shall be drawn based on All India Rank. 5. All associated with conduct of Exam including Central Govt., State Govt., institutions, Police etc. will extend all necessary support to CBSE and permit security 4 measures like use of electronic and communication devices Jammers etc. for timely and fair conduct of the NEET. 6. Any difficulty with regard to implementation of orders of this Com1 the stake holders may approach this Hon'ble Court."

p. 549, margin A

6

The learned counsel have also given the details with regard to the time when the result would be declared and counselling would take place.

p. 549, margin E

7

In view ofthe submissions made on behalf of the respondents, we record that NEET shall be held as stated by the respondents. We further clarify that notwithstanding any order passed by any Court earlier with regard to not holding NEET, this order shall operate. Therefore, no further order is required to be passed at this stage.

p. 549, margin E

8

It may be mentioned here that some learned counsel representing those who are not parties to this petition have made submissions that in view of the judgment passed in Christian Medical College, Vellore & Ors. Vs. Union oflndia & Ors., reported in (2014) 2 SCC 305, it would not be proper to hold NEET and this order should not affect pending matters.

p. 549, margin F

9

We do not agree with the first submission for the reason that the said judgment has already been recalled on 11th April, 2016 and therefore, the Notifications dated 21st December, 201 0 are in operation as on today. It may however be clarified that by this order hearing of the petitions which are pending before this Court will not be affected. The petition be now listed in due course. Devika Gujral Writ petition pending.

pp. 549–550, margin G