Supreme Court of India

SARASWATI SUGAR MILLS versus HARYANA STATE BOARD AND ORS.

Decided: 22 October 1991
Judges listed: V. RAMASWAMI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Disposed off

Citations

Official

[1991] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 523 · 1991 INSC 267

Also cited as

(1992) 1 SCC 418 (13 citing judgments)
AIR 1992 SC 224 (3 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 6 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

M/S MAMTA SURGICAL COTTON INDUSTRIES, RAJASTHAN versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ANTI-EVASION), BHILWARA, RAJASTHAN 23 January 2014 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 17
ORIENT PAPER AND INDUSTRIES LTD. versus THE STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. 9 November 2006 · bench of 2 judges
M/S. SONEBHADRA FUELS versus COMMISSIONER, TRADE TAX, U.P. LUCKNOW 1 August 2006 · bench of 2 judges
M/S. KORES INDIA LTD., CHENNAI versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI 23 November 2004 · bench of 2 judges
M/S PARK LEATHER INDUSTRY (P) LTD. AND ANR. versus STATE OF U.P. 14 February 2001 · bench of 2 judges

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.