Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

BAI ACHHUBA AMAR SINGH versus SRI KALIDAS HARNATH OJHA AND OTHERS

Decided
6 December 1963
Judges listed
K. SUBBA RAO (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[1964] 5 S.C.R. 853 · 1963 INSC 247

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

In view of the judgment of the majority, the Order of the High Court is set aside and that of the Revenue Tribunal restored. The costs throughout will be borne by Respondent No. I. · SRI RAMA VILAS SERVICE (P) LTD.

p. 869

v.

p. 869

C. CHANDRASEKARAN & ORS. (P.B. K.C. JJ.)

p. 869

of

p. 869

of of of

p. 869

The Regional Transport Authority granted one stage carriage permit to the appellant. appeal, the State Transport Appel-

p. 869