Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

MAHA P. & ORS. versus THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.

Decided
22 July 2022
Judges listed
D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, A.S. BOPANNA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2022] 6 S.C.R. 817 ยท 2022 INSC 1311

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

1

In paragraph 2 of the judgment of this Court dated 18 May 2022, it has been recorded that the Government had issued orders permitting NRI candidates to cure defects in attestation by 31 March 2022. This statement appears to be consistent with the facts set out in para 10 of the judgment of the Single Judge dated 4 April 2022.

p. 818, margin A

2

The State of Kerala has moved the application for modification stating that, as a matter of fact, there was no extension of the date for curing defects in attestation until 31 March 2022 and the last date was, in fact, 2 March 2022. Mr Nishi Rajen Shonker, learned counsel states that the above sentence in the judgment of this court has given rise to another proceeding in the High Court.

p. 818, margin B

3

The issue as to whether there was any extension of time beyond 2 March 2022 was not a matter for determination in the proceedings before this Court. The issue may, therefore, be decided in appropriate proceedings on its own merits on the basis of the record.

p. 818, margin C

4

The Miscellaneous Application is accordingly disposed of with the above clarification.

p. 818, margin D