Supreme Court of India

RAM PRASAD versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided: 12 May 1999
Judges listed: K.T. THOMAS (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Disposed off

Citations

Official

[1999] 3 S.C.R. 519 · 1999 INSC 243

Also cited as

(1999) 5 SCC 30 (6 citing judgments)
AIR 1999 SC 1969 (5 citing judgments)
(1999) SCC(CRI) 651 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 8 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

VIJAYA versus STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE 15 September 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 8
STATE OF RAJASTHAN versus BALVEER @ BALLI AND ANR. 31 October 2013 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 14
PUTCHALAPALLI NARESH REDDY versus STATE OF A.P. AND ETC. 18 October 2013 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 27
MRINAL DAS & ORS. versus THE STATE OF TRIPURA 5 September 2011 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 18
RANJIT SINGH AND ORS. versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 27 October 2010 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 24

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.