Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

UNION OF INDIA versus FACULTY ASSOCIATION OF ALLMS

Decided
16 January 2014
Judges listed
H.L. DATTU, S.S. NIJJAR, RANJAN GOGOI, M.Y. EQBAL, VIKRAMAJIT SEN (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2014] 14 S.C.R. 1651

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

1

Permission to file Review Petition is granted.

p. 1652, margin A

2

Application of oral hearing is allowed.

p. 1652, margin A

3

Heard Shri L.N. Rao, learned Additional Solicitor General.

p. 1652, margin B

4

We clarify that it is for the Central Governmentto take a decision as to whether there should be a reservation for super specialty posts.

p. 1652, margin B

5

With this clarification the Review Petitions are disposed of. END OF 2014 ***1r***

p. 1652, margin C