Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

MAHESH CHAND SHARMA versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

Decided
1 April 2014
Judges listed
T.S. THAKUR (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2014] 14 S.C.R. 1633

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

1

Delay condoned. Leave granted.

p. 1633, margin E

2

The points that fall for consideration in these appeals are squarely answered by our judgment delivered today in Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No.27829 of 2012 etc. etc. titled Manmohan Sharma v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

p. 1633, margin F

3

For the reasons set out in that judgment, we dispose of these appeals on terms similar to those_ set out in the judgment leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

p. 1633, margin G