Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY ETC versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Decided
13 January 2023
Judges listed
D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2023] 3 S.C.R. 1014 ยท 2023 INSC 35

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

1

The petitioners seek the transfer of WP (C) No 8905 of 2019 pending before the Delhi High Court and CW/13784/2019 pending before the Rajasthan High Court to this Court.

p. 1014, margin G

2

The issue which is raised in the main proceedings pertains to uniformity in the minimum age of marriage for men and women in diverse legislations.

p. 1015, margin A

3

Dr Manish Singhvi, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents states that CW/13784/2019 has been dismissed for want of prosecution by the Rajasthan High Court.

p. 1015, margin A

4

In this backdrop, we dispose of the transfer petitions by transferring WP (C) No 8905 of 2019 pending before the Delhi High Court to this Court.

p. 1015, margin B

5

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

p. 1015, margin B