Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

UNION OF INDIA versus M/S. AGRO ENGINEERING (MP). PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

Decided
9 February 1996
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[1996] 2 S.C.R. 409 · 1996 INSC 220
Not shown
1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Delay Condoned. Leave granted.

p. 409, margin F

There are three orders passed by this Court : in Union of India v. Aarbee Pipe & Profiles & Ors., dated February 1, 1996 by a Bench of three Judges ; Umesh Textile & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., dated December 5, 1995 by a Bench of two Judges and State of M.P. v. Agro Engineering (MP) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., dated November 1, 1995 by a Bench of two Judges. The substratum of the directions in all those cases is that if the applications are made on or before September 30, 1988 substantially complying·with the requirements enumerated in the guidelines issued by the Government of India, they would be considered and disposed of for granting subsidy as per the scheme. The same should be the order in this case. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. The matter is remitted to the Government and the Committee constituted in that behalf would examine the case and dispose it pf in the light of the law laid down by this Court. No costs. G.N. Appeal disposed of.

pp. 409–410, margin G