Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

TEJPAL versus STATE OF U.P.

Decided
22 September 2014
Judges listed
M.Y. EQBAL (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[2014] 14 S.C.R. 1359 · 2014 INSC 658

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

1

We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and also learned counsel for the respondent State. We have already discussed all the facts and circumstances of the case in Criminal Appeal Nos:1551-1554 of 2008 filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the same have been dismissed by a separate judgment pronounced today.

p. 1359, margin F

2

So far as the present appeal by Tej Pal is concerned, separate special leave petition preferred by one of the accused namely Narendra has already been dismissed by this Court. We also do not find any merit in this appeal filed by accused Tej Pal which is also dismissed.

pp. 1359–1360, margin G