Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPEMNT CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. versus RAMESHWAR DASS (DEAD) & ORS.

Decided
8 April 2021
Judges listed
UDAY UMESH LALIT (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2021] 4 S.C.R. 31 ยท 2021 INSC 238

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

1

These special leave petitions filed by various land holders seek to challenge the decision dated 09.03.2018 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No.2373 of 2010 (O&M) and other connected matters) i.e. in Madan Pal-III v. State of Haryana and another . This decision of the High Court was subject matter of challenge in this Court which was dealt with by the Judgment in Wazir v. State of Haryana .

p. 43, margin B

2

In all these cases there has been delay in preferring special leave petitions. However, considering the facts on record, we condone the delay.

p. 43, margin C

3

The Judgment passed by this Court in Wazir v. State of Haryana as explained by the instant Order in M.A. Nos.926-930 of 2019 and IA No.118262 of 2019 herein above is to apply to all cases of land holders from the concerned villages under the present acquisition.

p. 43, margin D

4

Since all the issues already stand dealt with by the Judgment in Wazir v. State of Haryana , nothing further need be done in the present petitions except to state that these cases shall be governed in every respect by the directions issued by this Court in its Judgment in Wazir v. State of Haryana , as explained by the instant Order.

p. 43, margin E

5

The petitions stand disposed of in above terms.

p. 43, margin F