Supreme Court of India

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, AYURVEDIC AND UNANI TIBIA COLLEGE, DELHI versus THE STATE OF DELHI AND ANOTHER

Decided: 23 October 1961
Judges listed: BHUVNESHWAR PRASAD SINHA, S.K. DAS, A.K. SARKAR, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, J.R. MUDHOLKAR (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Dismissed

Citations

Official

[1962] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 156 · 1961 INSC 299

Also cited as

AIR 1962 SC 458 (10 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 7 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

OPERATION ASHA versus SHELLY BATRA & ORS. 4 August 2025 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 57 and 3 other paragraphs
PANDURANG GANPATI CHAUGULE versus VISHWASRAO PATIL MURGUD SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED 5 May 2020 · bench of 5 judges · cites it at para 55
NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NOIDA) versus ARMY WELFARE HOUSING ORGANIZATION & ORS. 10 September 2010 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 26
TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL WORKERS UNION versus TATA MEMORIAL CENTRE AND ANOTHER 9 August 2010 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 55
MOHAMMAD SADIQ AND ORS. versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. 21 September 2007 · bench of 2 judges

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.