Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

RAMNARAYAN MOR AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
16 December 1963
Judges listed
BHUVNESHWAR PRASAD SINHA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[1964] 5 S.C.R. 1064 · 1963 INSC 257
Also cited as
  • AIR 1964 SC 949 (8 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 2 other Supreme Court judgments we hold.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Jn view of the Judgment of the majority, the appeal fails and is dismissed.

p. 1098

THE STATE OF PUNJAB

p. 1098

v.

p. 1098

S. RATTAN SINGH (P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. SUBBA RAO, K.N. WANCHOO, J:C. SHAH AND RAGHUBAR DAYAL JJ.)

p. 1098

of IV of 4 II-Scope of-Civil if

p. 1098