Supreme Court of India

UCO BANK versus THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR HIGH COURT, BOMBAY AND ANR.

Decided: 11 July 1994
Judges listed: J.S. VERMA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)

Citations

Official

[1994] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 294 · 1994 INSC 229

Also cited as

(1994) 5 SCC 1 (6 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 5 other Supreme Court judgments we hold.

ESSA@ ANJUM ABDUL RAZAK MEMON versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH STF, CBI MUMBAI, PART-II 21 March 2013 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 350
JITENDRA NATH SINGH versus THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR & ORS. 21 September 2012 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 3
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER versus O.L. OF ESSKAY PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED 8 November 2011 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 29 and 1 other paragraph
ANDHRA BANK versus OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND ANR. 14 March 2005 · bench of 3 judges
TEXTILE LABOUR ASSOCIATION AND ANR. versus THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND ANR. 12 April 2004 · bench of 3 judges

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.