Supreme Court of India

MC DOWELL & COMPANY LIMITED versus THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER

Decided: 17 April 1985
Judges listed: Y.V. CHANDRACHUD (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Dismissed

Citations

Official

[1985] 3 S.C.R. 791 · 1985 INSC 92

Also cited as

(1985) 3 SCC 230 (15 citing judgments)
AIR 1986 SC 649 (4 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 5 other Supreme Court judgments we hold.

SHIV RAJ GUPTA versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI-IV 22 July 2020 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 6
VODAFONE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS B.V. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 20 January 2012 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 57 and 2 other paragraphs
STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. versus MAHARASHTRA DISTILLERIES LTD. AND ORS 6 May 2005 · bench of 5 judges and 1 other paragraph
CALCUTTA CHROMOTYPE LTD. versus COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CALCUTTA 31 March 1998 · bench of 2 judges
SHROFF & CO., ETC. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY AND ANOTHER, ETC. 12 August 1988 · bench of 2 judges

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.