Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

M/S. SUNNY INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. versus COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CALCUTTA

Decided
25 March 2003
Judges listed
M.B. SHAH (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[2003] 3 S.C.R. 18 · 2003 INSC 183
Also cited as
  • (2003) 4 SCC 280 (4 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 1 other Supreme Court judgment we hold.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Unnumbered paragraph

SHAH, J. It is the contention of the appellant Company that 1t 1s engaged in manufacture inter alia of Ad-vitamin Massage Oil forte (Patent or Proprietary Medicines) since 1949 on the basis of sanction accorded by the Drug Control Authorities. This preparation was brought and classified for levy of duty of Excise with effect from 1.3.1961 falling under Tariff Item No.14-E of the First Schedule to the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act").By order dated 26.12.1985, the Assistant Collector classified the said product under Tariff Item No.14-F (Heading 3304.00) excisable as cosmetics goods. Collector (Appeals) also affirmed the order of the Assistant Collector by order dated 29.4.1986. Against that order, appellant preferred appeal No.E-2226/86-C before the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal ("Tribunal" for short) which was also dismissed by order dated 26.10.1988. Aggrieved thereby, appellant filed Civil Appeal No.138 of 1 %9 before this Court.

pp. 19–20, margin E

Unnumbered paragraph

In the meanwhile, the Central Excise Tariff was reconstituted with effect from 28.2.1986 as follows:- (i) 14E is equivalent to T.l. 30.03 of the Central Excise Tariff Act,

p. 20, margin B

Unnumbered paragraph

1985. (Medicaments) (ii) 14-F is equivalent to Tariff Item No. 33.04 of the Central Excise

p. 20, margin C

Unnumbered paragraph

Tariff Act, 1985. (Cosmetic Goods)

p. 20, margin C

Unnumbered paragraph

On re-construct.on of the tariff as aforesaid, the appellant submitted its classification list No. 2/86 dated 3.3.1986 claiming classification of its product under heading 3003.19 as patent and proprietary medicine. Upon receipt thereof, the Assistant Collector issued notice to the appellant to show cause as to why the product should not be classified under sub-heading No.3304.00 in view of the change of Tariff des·~ription after 1985 budget. Being not satisfied with reply of the appellant, the Assistant Collector modified the classification of the said product from Chapter 30 to Chapter 33 and approved classification heading 3304.00. Appeals filed by the appellants before the Collector (Appeals) and the Tribunal were also dismissed.

p. 20, margin C

Unnumbered paragraph

The Tribunal observed that the vitamins are added in several cosmetic preparations, skin care lotion etc. but mere addition of vitamins would not render the product as a drug. The product has to be judged entirely in the light of the words in tariff and not with reference to the licence under the Drug Control Act. After detailed scrutiny of the documents filed by the appellant and the contentions raised by the parties, the Tribunal arrived at the conclusion that the classification done by the authorities below under subheading 3304.00 is correct and the product in question is clearly a massage oil, intended for care of the skin but possibly having some marginal medicinal properties.

p. 20, margin E

Unnumbered paragraph

Aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal, the appellant has preferred Civil Appeal N<?.4589 of 1995.

p. 20, margin G

Unnumbered paragraph

It is contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that the product Ad-vitamin massage Oil Forte was considered as medicine and it would covered under heading 3003 .19 as patent and proprietary medicine. submitted that the product is primarily a drug. This is because: (i)It contains a drug or medicinal preparation in Oil form;

pp. 20–21, margin H

Unnumbered paragraph

(ii) It is used for massage; (iii) It prevents the ailment or rickets and treats the same; (iv) It has a trade mark and symbol including that it is a proprietary.

p. 21, margin A

Unnumbered paragraph

The question that arises for consideration in these appeals is whether the product in question can be classified as a cosmetics and toilet preparation falling under Tariff Item 33.04 or as patent or proprietary medicine Tariff Item No.30.03?

p. 21, margin B

Unnumbered paragraph

For this purpose, we would refer to the relevant part of tariff entries under:

p. 21, margin C

Unnumbered paragraph

Old Tariff Entries:

p. 21, margin D

Unnumbered paragraph

Item No.14E-Patent or Proprietary Medicines. Item No. Tariff Description Rate of Duty 14E. Patent or Proprietary medicines Twelve and a half not containing alcohol, opium per cent ad valorem. Indian hemp or other narcotics other than those medicines which are exclusively Ayurvedic, Unani

p. 21, margin D

Unnumbered paragraph

Sidha or Homoeopathic. Item No.14F-Cosmetics and Toilet Preparations. Item No. Tariff Description Rate of Duty 14F. Cosmetics and toilet preparations One hundred per not containing alcohol or opium, cent ad valorem. Indian Hemp or other narcotic Drugs or narcotics, namely (i) Preparations for the care of the skin including beauty creams, vanishing creams, cold creams, make-up creams, cleansing creams, skin foods and tonics, face powders, baby powders, toilet powders, talcum

pp. 21–22, margin E

Unnumbered paragraph

powders and lipsticks.

p. 22, margin A

Unnumbered paragraph

(ii) - (iii) ..... "

p. 22, margin B

Unnumbered paragraph

By introduction of Finance Bill, 1985. explanations II and Ill were added to the said tariff item No.14-F of the Central Excise Tariff. Relevant Explanation II reads as under:

p. 22, margin B

Unnumbered paragraph

Explanation-II: This item includes cosmetics and toilet preparations whether or not they contain subsidiary pharmaceutical or antiseptic constituents, or are held out as having subsidiary curative or prophylactic value." Equivalent Tariff Items After Reconstitution w.e.f. 28.2.1986 Entry No. Description of Goods 30.03 Medicaments (including veterinary medicaments) 33.04 Beauty or make-up preparations and preparations for the ca.re of the skin (other than medicaments), including sunscreen and suntan preparations,

p. 22, margin C

Unnumbered paragraph

manicure or pedicure preparation,.

p. 22, margin E

Unnumbered paragraph

Chapter Notes l(c) and (d) of Chapter 30 coupled with Chapter Notes 2 and 5 of Chapter 33 would c.learly reveal that the product in question cannot be termed as medicaments. The aforesaid Chapter Notes are as under:

p. 22, margin E

Unnumbered paragraph

Chapter 30 (Pharmaceutical Products) Note: I. This Chapter does not cover: ( c) Aqueous distillates or aqueous solutions of essential oils, suitable

p. 22, margin F

Unnumbered paragraph

for medicinal uses {Chapter 33 ); ( d) Preparations of Chapter 33 even if they have therapeutic or

p. 22, margin G

Unnumbered paragraph

prophylactic properties." Chapter 33 (Essential Oils and Resinoids; Perfumery, Cosmetic or Toilet Preparations): "2. Heading Nos.33.03 to 33.07 apply, inter a/ia, to products, whether or not mixed (other than aqueous distillates and aqueous solutions of essential oils), suitable for use as goods of these headings and put up in packings with labels, literature or other indications that they are for use as cosmetics or toilet preparations or put up in a form clearly specialised to such use and includes products whether or not they contain subsidiary pharmaceutical or antiseptic constituents, or are held out as having subsidiary curative or prophylactic value. 5. Heading No.33.04 applies, inter alia, to the following products: beauty creams, vanishing creams, cold creams, make-up creams, cleansing creams, skinfoods, skin tonics, face powders, baby powders, toilet powders, talcum powders and grease paints, lipstics, eye shadow and eyebrow pencils, nail polishes and varnishes, cuticle removers and other preparations for use in manicure or chiropody and barrier

p. 23, margin A

Unnumbered paragraph

creams to give protection against skin irritants. "

p. 23, margin D

Unnumbered paragraph

From the aforesaid Chapter notes, it is clear that heading 33 .03 would include products whether or not they contain subsidiary pharmaceutical or antiseptic constituents, or are held out as having subsidiary curative or prophylactic value and heading 33 .04 would inter a/ia include the products specified therein and other preparations for use in manicure or chiropody and barrier creams to give protection against skin irritants. Therefore, the product mainly oil containing some A&D vitamins which is used for massage, even if it prevents ailment of rickets and treats the same, it cannot be held to be medicaments.

p. 23, margin D

Unnumbered paragraph

Hence, in our view, after verification of the entire evidence and the certificates produced on record as well as the report of the Chemical Analyser, the Tribunal rightly arrived at the conclusion that the product in question is oil used for massage and would be covered by heading 33.04. Similar contention was raised in Mis. Alpine Industries v. Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi, [JT 2003 (l) SC 130]. The Court observed that 'Medicament' has been defined in note No.2(i) to mean 'goods which are either products comprising two or more constituents which have been mixed or compounded together for therapeutic or prophylactic use.' On a reading of note No. I ( d) with note No.2(i) of Chapter 30 under Heading 'Pharmaceutical Products', it is clear that preparations which fali under Chapter 33 even if they have therapeutic or prophylactic propen:ies are not covered under Heading 30.03 as 'medicaments'. The Court thereafter held thus:

pp. 23–24, margin F

Unnumbered paragraph

"The certificate issued by the Army Authorities alld the chemical ingredients of the product are not decisive on the question of classification of the product for levy of excise duty. It is firmly established that on the question of classification of the product under Central Excise Tariff Act, "commercial parlance theory" has to be applied. It is true that the entry supply by the appellant of its product "Lip Salve" has been to the Defence Department for use of military personnel but that would also not be determinative of the nature of the product for classifying it. It is not disputed that the product 'Lip Salve" is used for the care of the lips. It is a product essentially for "care of skin" and not for "cure of skin".lt is therefore, classifiable as a skin care cream and not a medicament. From the nature of the product and the use to which it is put, we do not find that the claim of the appellant is acceptable that it i.s primarily for therapeutic use."

p. 24, margin A

Unnumbered paragraph

The sam<: would be the position in the present case. Th.: oil is not used for cure of skin but is oil for massage and it takes care of the skin.

p. 24, margin D

Unnumbered paragraph

In this view of the matter, we: find no substance in these appeals and they are accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. N.J. Appeals dismissed.

p. 24, margin D