Supreme Court of India

NATHULAL versus PHOOLCHAND

Decided: 16 October 1969
Judges listed: J.C. SHAH (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Dismissed

Citations

Official

[1970] 2 S.C.R. 854 · 1969 INSC 290

Also cited as

AIR 1970 SC 546 (21 citing judgments)
(1969) 3 SCC 120 (19 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 7 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

LAXMAN TATYABA KANKATE & ANR. versus TARAMATI HARISHCHANDRA DHATRAK 8 July 2010 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 13
UMABAI AND ANR. versus NILKANTH DHONDIBA CHAVAN BY LRS. AND ANR. 13 April 2005 · bench of 2 judges and 1 other paragraph
MOOL CHAND BAKHRU AND ANR. versus ROHAN AND ORS. 29 January 2002 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 11
HAMZABI AND ORS. versus SYED KARIMUDDIN AND ORS. 28 November 2000 · bench of 2 judges
SMT. CHAND RANI (DEAD) BY L.RS. versus SMT. KAMAL RANI (DEAD) BY L.RS. 18 December 1992 · bench of 5 judges and 1 other paragraph

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.