Supreme Court of India

NEELIMA SHANGLA PH.D. CANDIDATE versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

Decided: 17 September 1986
Judges listed: O. CHINNAPPA REDDY (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Case Allowed

Citations

Official

[1986] 3 S.C.R. 785 · 1986 INSC 192

Also cited as

(1986) 4 SCC 268 (38 citing judgments)
(1986) SCC(L&S) 759 (34 citing judgments)
AIR 1987 SC 169 (3 citing judgments)
MANU/SC/0472/1986 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 15 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR versus MS. A. SHAINAMOL, IAS AND ANR 22 October 2021 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 28
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ANR. versus UMESH KUMAR 7 October 2020 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 14
MOHD. RASHID versus THE DIRECTOR, LOCAL BODIES, NEW SECRETARIAT & ORS. 15 January 2020 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 12
CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION & ANOTHER versus JASMINE KAUR & OTHERS 1 September 2014 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 14 and 1 other paragraph
MANOJ MANU & ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 12 August 2013 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 12

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.