Supreme Court of India

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA versus VIKAS SAHEBRAO ROUNDALE AND ORS.

Decided: 11 August 1992
Judges listed: N.M. KASLIWAL (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)

Citations

Official

[1992] 3 S.C.R. 792 · 1992 INSC 199

Also cited as

(1992) 4 SCC 435 (29 citing judgments)
AIR 1992 SC 1926 (10 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 9 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

PARIMAL KUMAR & ORS. versus THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS. 30 January 2025 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 5
ADARSH SHIKSHA MAHAVIDYALAYA AND OTHERS versus SUBHASH RAHANGDALE AND OTHERS 6 January 2012 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 2 and 1 other paragraph
SHRI MORVI SARVAJANIK KELAVNI MANDAL SANCHALIT MSKM B.ED. COLLEGE versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION AND ORS. 16 December 2011 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 10 and 1 other paragraph
KUMARI RANJANA MISHRA AND ANR. versus THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. 10 March 2011 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 5 and 1 other paragraph
MINOR SUNIL ORAON TR. GUARDIAN AND ORS. versus C.B.S.E. AND ORS. 13 November 2006 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 16

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.