Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

DANIRAIJI VRAJLALJI, JUNAGADH versus VAHUJI MAHARAJ SHRI CHANDRAPRABHA WIDOW OF DECEASED MAHARAJ SHRI PURUSHOTTAMLALJI RAGHUNATHLALJI JUNAGADH

Decided
13 December 1974
Judges listed
KUTTYIL KURIEN MATHEW (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[1975] 3 S.C.R. 32 · 1974 INSC 271
Not shown
1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

In accordance with the Judgments of the majority, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

p. 47, margin G

The order appointing Receiver is discharged. V.P.S.

p. 47, margin H