Supreme Court of India
STATE OF MYSORE versus FAKRUSAB BABUSAB KARANANDI
- Decided
- 17 December 1976
- Judges listed
- P.N. BHAGWATI
- Disposal
- Appeal(s) allowed
Citations
- Official
- [1977] 2 S.C.R. 544 · 1976 INSC 340
- Not shown
- 1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.
Cited by
Cited in 1 other Supreme Court judgment we hold.
Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.
The Court's text
Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.
After we delivered the judgment in this case, our attention was drawn to the fact that subsequent to the decision of the High Court, a fresh charge-sheet for the same offence was filed by the police against the respondent and in view of the amendment made in section 60, clause (b) by Mysore Act I of 1971, the learned Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the offence and tried the respondent and ultimately as result of the trial, the respondent was convicted and sentenced to irnt·risonment and in fact by :the time the appeal came to be heard by us, ·he had already served out his sentence of imprisonment. In view of this fact, it is unnecessary to remand the case to the learned Judicial Magist.rate for taking cognizance of the offence. We accordingly direct ·that the last part of the final order made by us which commences with the words "and remand the case" be deleted. S.R. Appeal allowed .
p. 547, margin C