Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

INDIAN PETROCHEMICALS CORPN. LTD. AND ANR. versus SHRAMIK SENA AND ORS .

Decided
8 April 1999
Judges listed
S.P. BHARUCHA, R.C. LAHOTI, N. SANTOSH HEGDE (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)

Citations

Official
[1999] 2 S.C.R. 532 · 1999 INSC 162

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Paragraph numbering in our copy is uncertain (page_count_mismatch). Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Civil Appeal No. 1854 of 1998 by the employer and Civil Appeal No. 1855 of 1998 by the employees arise from the same judgment of the High Court. Reliance was placed, during the course of their hearing, on an additional affidavit dated 19th February, 1999, filed recently (22nd February, 1999) on behalf of the employees. There is no reply by the employer to the said affidavit.

p. 532, margin F

There is no order of the Court that permits an additional affidavit to be filed. It is stated by the learned advocate-on-record for the employees that, as a matter of practice, such affidavits are filed and the Registry accepts them.

p. 532, margin G

The said affidavit is an affidavit in which facts are pleaded, additional to the facts placed before the High Court. No such affidavit could have been filed and taken on record without the express permission of the Court to file the affidavit and place additional material on record. The Registry is hereby directed to ensure that no affidavits are ta.ken on record in pending appeals, especially if they set out facts, unless orders of the Court permit them to be filed. This order shall be treated as a practice direction to be complied with hereafter in all matters.

pp. 532–533, margin H

· Adjourned for four weeks to enable the employer to file a reply to the said affidavit. To be treated as part-heard. T.N.A. Appeal pending.

p. 533, margin B