Supreme Court of India

CANARA BANK AND ORS. versus SHRI DEBASIS DAS AND ORS.

Decided: 12 March 2003
Judges listed: SHIVARAJ V. PATIL (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official

[2003] 2 S.C.R. 968 · 2003 INSC 174

Also cited as

(2003) 4 SCC 557 (83 citing judgments)
AIR 2003 SC 2041 (26 citing judgments)
(2003) SCC(L&S) 507 (17 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

2 other citation strings that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 12 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION versus SURENDRA PATWA & ORS 25 April 2025 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 12
KRISHNADATT AWASTHY versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. 4 April 2024 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 47
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS versus YOGENDERA MOHAN SENGUPTA AND ANOTHER 11 January 2024 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 56
ASSOCIATION OF VASANTH APARTMENTS’ OWNERS versus V. GOPINATH & ORS 13 February 2023 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 90
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 24 February 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 22

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.