Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, ETC. versus ESCORTS LTD. & OTHERS, ETC .

Decided
30 April 1984
Judges listed
S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[1984] 3 S.C.R. 643 · 1984 INSC 96

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

FAZAL ALI, J~ . .In SU' (C) Nos. 5392/84 & 5412~4.

p. 644, margin D

We have heard learned Attorney General ..for the petitioriors and Mr. Palkhivala, learned counsel for respqndents at length.

p. 644, margin D

Special leave granted. There will be. an order vacating the . order of stay/injunction passed by the Single Ju.\lge of the High Co11rt, .prohibiting any action being taken on . the basis of the requisitio.n put in by L.I.C. We direct that all appropriate proceedings will be taken in accordance ·with Jaw· on the basis of tho requisition. .However, no effect should be given to.any resol.ution t:be company may pass at the extra:orginary general meeting to -be held in consequence of the requisition without obtaining prior directions from this Court. The pendency of these cases in this Court will no\. stand in the way of holding the ann~l general meeting of the . company in the norinal course. These appeals are disposed of except that they will be kept pending for the limited purpoil'e to enable counsel to move this Court for directions as indicated above·. In computing the time for taking steps· pursuant to the requisititon, the periOd from the.date of requisition· till this day wHI be excluded in view of interim stay/injunction granted by the High Court.

p. 644, margin D

Th.e prayer for amendment of the cause title is allowed, .

p. 644, margin G

i. c.. v. <Fazal Ali, J) Transfer Petition (C) No t90 of 1984.

p. 645

Mr. Palkhivala, learned counsel on behalf of the respondents stltes that matter is being liste.d before' the High Court. for final hearing on 11th June, 1984 and he assures this Court that his clients will . fully co·qperate so that the case can he heard and fin.ally disposed of in the High Court by the end ofJune, 1984. We request the High. Court to.di~pose of the matter finally as expeditiously as · possible. In view of this, the learned Attorney General does not pNss the Transfer Petition fo~ the present which is accordingly dismissed. N.V.K. Writ· Petition allowed·.

p. 645

Transfer Petition dismissed

p. 645, margin C

. . ..

p. 645, margin C