Supreme Court of India

THE STATE OF PUNJAB versus SODHI SUKHDEV SINGH

Decided: 15 November 1960
Judges listed: BHUVNESHWAR PRASAD SINHA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official

[1961] 2 S.C.R. 371 · 1960 INSC 200

Also cited as

AIR 1961 SC 493 (43 citing judgments)
1960 SCC OnLine SC 38 (3 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 13 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS & ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 15 February 2024 · bench of 5 judges
STATE OF ORISSA & ANR. versus LAXMI NARAYAN DAS (DEAD) THR. LRS & ORS. 12 July 2023 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 51
MAHADEO & ORS versus SMT. SOVAN DEVI & ORS 30 August 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 15
THE MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, BARWALA, DISTRICT HISAR, HARYANA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY/PRESIDENT versus JAI NARAYAN AND COMPANY & ANR 29 March 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 13 and 1 other paragraph
ESTATE OFFICER AND ANR. versus CHARANJIT KAUR 7 September 2021 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 20

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.