Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

VIJAY SHANKAR PANDEY versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Decided
24 September 2014
Judges listed
JASTI CHELAMESWAR, A.K. SIKRI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Order on PUD/Clerical error

Citations

Official
[2014] 13 S.C.R. 1265 · 2014 INSC 663

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Paragraph numbering in our copy is uncertain (unnumbered_in_numbered_era). Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

It is mentioned today by Mr. Pallav Shishodia, learned senior counsel that in the Judgement delivered on 22nd September, 2014 in this appeal, a factual error occured at F paragraph 44. In the said paragraph, the name of Mr. Jasveer Singh is mentioned whereas the correct name is Mr. Suneel Kumar. The paragraph stands modified accordingly.

p. 1265