Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

MAHAMUDUL HASSAN versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

Decided
8 October 2010
Judges listed
MARKANDEY KATJU, T.S. THAKUR (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[2010] 12 S.C.R. 257 · 2010 INSC 688

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Paragraph numbering in our copy is uncertain (unnumbered_in_numbered_era). Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

p. 257, margin F

This is a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution making various prayers.

p. 257, margin G

Petitioner, who is a Bangladesh national, has been convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dakshin Dinajpur at Balurghat, West Bengal under the Foreigners Act for illegally entering India and sentenced to undergo two years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rupees ten thousand.

pp. 257–258, margin G

In our opinion, if the petitioner has a grievance against that judgment, he has a right of appeal to the High Court on the judicial side. He can also approach the concerned executive authority under Section 432 Cr.P.C. or to the Governor under Article 161 of the Constitution of India. This is a judicial Court and hence this Court has no power which the executive has

p. 258, margin A

under Section 432 Cr.P.C or which the Governor has under Article 161 of the Constitution.

p. 258, margin A

With these observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed. R.P. Writ petition dimissed.

p. 258, margin C