Supreme Court of India

PUNJAB BEVERAGES PVT. LTD., CHANDIGARH versus SURESH CHAND AND ANR.

Decided: 21 February 1978
Judges listed: M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official

[1978] 3 S.C.R. 370 · 1978 INSC 48

Also cited as

(1978) 2 SCC 144 (53 citing judgments)
(1978) SCC(L&S) 165 (14 citing judgments)
AIR 1978 SC 995 (11 citing judgments)
MANU/SC/0273/1978 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 11 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

KALYAN DOMBIVALI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION versus SANJAY GAJANAN GHARAT AND ANOTHER 31 March 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 31
SANJAY RAMDAS PATIL versus SANJAY AND OTHERS 1 September 2021 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 25
UNION OF INDIA versus ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA AND OTHERS 28 August 2020 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 94
SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY 23 September 2008 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 19
UNITED BANK OF INDIA versus SIDHARTHA CHAKRABORTY 27 August 2007 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 3 and 1 other paragraph

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.