Supreme Court of India

SUR ENAMEL AND STAMPING WORKS (P) LTD. versus THEIR WORKMEN

Decided: 7 May 1963
Judges listed: P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Case Partly allowed

Citations

Official

[1964] 3 S.C.R. 616 · 1963 INSC 134

Also cited as

AIR 1963 SC 1914 (30 citing judgments)
1963 SCC OnLine SC 97 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 6 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

CHAMOLI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. THROUGH ITS SECRETARY/ MAHAPRANDHAK & ANR. versus RAGHUNATH SINGH RANA & ORS. 17 May 2016 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 19
GENERAL MANAGER, HARYANA ROADWAYS versus RUDHAN SINGH 14 July 2005 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 5
M/S. U.P. DRUGS AND PHARMACEUTICALS CO. LTD. versus RAMANUJ YADAV AND ORS. 23 September 2003 · bench of 2 judges
AIR INDIA LTD. versus M. YOGESHWAR RAJ 2 May 2000 · bench of 2 judges
MOHAN LAL versus MANAGEMENT OF M/S BHARAT ELECTRONICS LTD. 21 April 1981 · bench of 2 judges

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.