Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHER versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Decided
15 March 2024
Judges listed
D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, SANJIV KHANNA, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2024] 3 S.C.R. 417 ยท 2024 INSC 209

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Paragraph 1

An application has been filed by the Election Commission of India seeking further directions.

p. 418

Paragraph 2

In the order of this Court dated 11 March 2024, this Court had directed that ECI shall upload on its website the data furnished to this Court in compliance with the interim order dated 12 April 2019 which was being maintained in the custody of this Court. While issuing this direction, the Court has presumed that a copy of the data which was lodged before the Registry of this Court would be available with the ECI.

p. 418

Paragraph 3

Mr Amit Sharma, counsel appearing on behalf of the ECI states that, as a matter of fact, ECI did not retain a copy of the data which was collated by it since it was being placed before this Court in sealed custody.

p. 419

Paragraph 4

The request, therefore, of the ECI is that the data which was filed before this Court be returned to it to enable it to comply with the order of this Court for uploading all the documents. This request of the ECI has not been opposed by Mr Kapil Sibal and Mr Vijay Hansaria, senior counsel and Mr Prashant Bhushan, counsel for the petitioners.

p. 419

Paragraph 5

We accordingly issue the following directions: (i) The Registrar (Judicial) of this Court shall ensure that the data which has been filed by ECI in pursuance of the interim orders of this Court is scanned and digitized. This may be carried out preferably by 5 pm tomorrow (16 March 2024); (ii) Once the above exercise is completed, the originals shall be returned to Mr Amit Sharma, counsel appearing on behalf of ECI; (iii) ECI shall then upload the data on its website on or before 5 pm on 17 March 2024; and (iv) A copy of the scanned and digitized files shall also be made available to Mr Amit Sharma to obviate the replication of the process of digitization.

p. 419

Paragraph 6

The Miscellaneous Application is accordingly disposed of.

p. 419

Paragraph 7

The judgment of the Constitution Bench in Association for Democratic Reforms vs Union of India required the State Bank of India to furnish to the ECI all details of the Electoral Bonds purchased, and, as the case may, redeemed by political parties, including the date of purchase/redemption, name of the purchaser and the denomination of the Electoral Bond purchased. It has been submitted that SBI has not disclosed the alpha-numeric numbers of the Electoral Bonds.

p. 419

Paragraph 8

The Solicitor General of India submits that since he is not appearing for SBI, notice may be issued to it.

p. 420

Paragraph 9

We direct the Registry to issue notice to SBI, returnable on 18 March 2024. Additionally, we also direct the presence of a Senior Officer of SBI who is responsible for the management and storage of details of Bonds purchased and redeemed on the next date of hearing.

p. 420

Paragraph 10

A copy of this order shall be served by the Registrar (Judicial) on Mr Sanjay Kapur, Standing Counsel for SBI. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain Result of the case: Miscellaneous Application disposed of.

p. 420